Analysis of Error in Solving Fraction and Decimals Viewed from The Nolting Theory in Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Students

Authors

  • Lutfi Sagita Fitri UIN Prof. K. H. Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto
  • Irma Dwi Tantri UIN Saizu Purwokerto

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24090/icontrees.2023.341

Keywords:

decimal, error, fraction, nolting

Abstract

This research was driven by the low score of mathematics in fractions and decimals at MI Negeri 1 Banyumas. The ability of students during the pandemic transition is different from students who attended school before the pandemic. This is known from the average daily test scores on fractions and decimals problems. Therefore, this study aims to analyze: (1) the types of errors and (2) the proportion of errors made by students in solving fractions and decimals problems in terms of the Nolting Theory. This research is a field research involving 28 grade IV students at MI Negeri 1 Banyumas as a subject. The data obtained from the results of tests and interviews with students. Data analysis was carried out using a quantitative descriptive approach to describe the types of errors and the proportion of each error. The results showed that of the 28 grade IV MI Negeri 1 Banyumas students, several types of errors were found, namely misdirection errors, careless errors, conceptual errors, application errors, test taking errors, and study errors. Quantitatively the largest proportion of errors in each number are careless errors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arosyi, Gema. (2018). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Bertipe PISA Berdasarkan Teori Noltin. (n.d.). Retrieved November 17, 2022, from https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/bitstream/123456789/40038/1/Gema%20Aroysi-FITK

Butarbutar, M., Anisah, H. U., Theng, B. P., Setyawati, C. Y., Nobelson, M.Si, (2022). Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian: Pendekatan Multidisipliner. Media Sains Indonesia.

D, D., Khasanah, M., & Putri, A. M. (2021). Penguatan Literasi, Numerasi, dan Adaptasi Teknologi Pada Pembelajaran Di Sekolah: (Sebuah Upaya Menghadapi Era Digital dan Disrupsi). Eksponen, 11(2), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.47637/eksponen.v11i2.381

Ekowati, D. W., & Suwandayani, B. I. (2018). Literasi Numerasi Untuk Sekolah Dasar. UMMPress.

Lestari, F. (2021). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Operasi Hitung Pecahan Pada Pelajaran Matematika Kelas V SD Negeri 07 Kota Bengkulu. Institut Agama Islam Negeri Bengkulu.

Marpaung, N. Q. R. (2018). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika di MTs Swasta Aisyiyah Sumatera Utara [PhD Thesis]. Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara Medan.

Nolting, P. D. (2012). Math study skills workbook: Your guide to reducing text anxiety and improving study strategies (4th ed). Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning.

Rahma, U. A. (2014). Pengaruh Pengamalan Ajaran Islam Terhadap Kecerdasan Emosional Siswa di SMAN 1 Trenggalek Tahun Ajaran 2013/2014. http://repo.uinsatu.ac.id/620/

Rahmawati, D., & Permata, L. D. (2018). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Program Linear Dengan Prosedur Newman. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika, 5(2), Article 2. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/jpm/article/view/26050

Suciati, I., & Wahyuni, D. S. (2018). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Pada Operasi Hitung Pecahan Pada Siswa Kelas V SDN Pengawu. JPPM (Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Matematika), 11(2), Article 2. https://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/JPPM/article/view/3760

Sukmawati, S., & Amelia, R. (2020). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa SMP Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Materi Segiempat Berdasarkan Teori Nolting. JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif), 3(5), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v3i5.p%p

Yunus S.B, M. (2014). Mindset Revolution. Galangpress Publisher.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-01

How to Cite

Fitri, L. S., & Tantri, I. D. (2023). Analysis of Error in Solving Fraction and Decimals Viewed from The Nolting Theory in Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Students. Proceeding of Saizu International Conference on Transdisciplinary Religious Studies, 221–228. https://doi.org/10.24090/icontrees.2023.341