Comparison Between Sheikh Amongraga’s and Tambangraras’ Actions in Serat Centhini and The Novel of Centhini: Kekasih Yang Tersembunyi

Authors

  • Pardi Pardi Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional
  • Dimas Indianto S UIN Prof. K. H. Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto
  • Yusro Edi Nugroho Universitas Negeri Semarang
  • Saefu Zaman Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional
  • Dian Susilastri Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24090/icontrees.2023.695

Keywords:

transformation, comparison, deviation

Abstract

Serat Centhini written by Pakubuwana V in 1815 was transformed into a novel entitled Centhini: Kekasih yang Tersembunyi by Elizabet D. Inandiak in 2015. As a transformed work, the novel can be assured to contain different points (deviation and replacement) from Serat Centhini as a hypogram. There are things deviated in the novel Centhini: Kekasih yang Tersembunyi from the ones in Serat Centhini, like the differences of behaviors or actions of the characters. This study will discuss differences of actions taken by Tambangraras and Sheikh Amongraga in the episode empat puluh malam di pelaminan. This study aims to describe the differences of Tambangraras’ and Sheikh Amongraga’s actions in the novel Centhini and the ones in Serat Centhini. This study was derived from the theory of transformation by using a comparison technique. The data of this study was collected from an objective analysis of a hypogram and transformed work through observation and note-taking in a qualitative approach. In this regard, the actions and behaviors of Sheikh Amongraga and Tambangraras shown in Serat Centhini were compared to those shown in the novel Centhini: Kekasih yang Tersembunyi. From this study, it can be concluded that there are striking differences in terms of their behaviors and actions in the hypogram and the transformed novel. Consequently, readers cannot only rely on the transformed novel in understanding Serat Centhini. Both works must be viewed as different or independent work.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Behrend, Timothy E. 1995. Serat Jatiswara: Struktur dan Perubahan di dalam Puisi Jawa 1600—

Florida, Nancy. 2012. “Titik-Titik Terakhir Pujangga Panutup: Jaman Edannya Ranggawarsita di Surakarta pada Akhir Tahun 1873”. Makalah dalam Simposium Ke-14 Masyarakat

Bahasa DI Yogyakarta.

Haryono, Timbul. 1998. “Serat Centhini sebagai Sumber Informasi Jenis Makanan Tradisional Masa Lampau” Dalam Majalah Humaniora. Nomor VIII. Edisi Juni—Agustus 1998. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Sastra Universitas Gadjahmada.

Haryono, Timbul.. 2016. “Sekilas tentang Serat Centhini dari Kuliner Jawa”. Setelah 200 Tahun Serat Centhini: Erotisme & Relegiusitas dalam Kitab-Kitab Nusantara: Borobudur Writer & Cultural Festival.

Inandiak, Elizabeth D. 2015. Centhini: Kekasih yang Tersembunyi. Jakarta: Penerbit Gramedia.

Jauss, Hans Robert. 1974. “Leterary History as a Challenge to Literary Theory” dalam New Directions in Literary History (Ralph Cohen, Ed.). London: Routledge & Keegan Paul.

Jauss, Hans Robert. 1983. To Word an Aesthetic of Reception. Mineapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Junanah. 2008. “Dialektika Bahasa Arab dalam Karya Serat Centhini”. Jurnal Fenomena (Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian). Volume 6 Nomor 1. Maret 2008.

Junanah. 2010. “Kajian Morfosintaksis terhadap Serat Centhini.” dalam Jurnal Millah. Volume X, Nomor 1 Agustus 2010.

Junus, Umar. 1985. Resepsi Sastra: Sebuah Pengantar. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Marsono, dkk. 1998. “Makanan Tradisional dalam Serat Centhini.” Yogyakarta: Pusat Kajian Makanan Tradisional.

Muslifah, Siti. 2013. “Akulturasi Budaya Timur Tengah ke Indonesia dan Pengaruhnya dalam Kesusastraan: Studi Kasus pada Serat Centhini. Jurnal CMES Volume VI Nomor 1, Edisi Januari—Juni 2013. Surakarta: Fakultas Sastra dan Seni Rupa. Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Nurnaningsih. 2015. “The Metaphors of Sexual Organs, Sexual Activities, and Sexual Activities Impacts in Serat Centhini, Written by Pakubuwana V”. Dalam International Journal of Language and Linguistics. Volume 2, Nomor 5. November 2015.

Pradopo, Rachmat Djoko. 1986. “Estetika Resepsi dan Teori Penerapannya”. Dalam Sulastin-Sutrisno, dkk. Bahasa dan Budaya. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada Press.

Pradopo, Rachmat Djoko. 2007. Beberapa Teori Sastra, Metode Kritik, dan Penerapannya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Sudaryanto. 2013. Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan secara Linguistis. Yogyakarta: Universitas Sanata Dharma University Press.

Suratno, Pardi. 2016. “The Character of Tambangraras and Centhini in Serat Centhini Composed by Pakubuwana V”. Makalah dalam International Seminar Character Education across Culture. Denpasar: Universitas Dharma Acarya.

Teeuw, A. 1984. Sastra dan Ilmu Sastra Sastra: Pengantar Teori Sastra. Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya.

Wibawa, Sutrisna. 2013.” Nilai Filosofi Jawa dalam Serat Centhini” (dalam Jurnal Litera. Volume 12, Nomor 2, Oktober 2013).

Wibawa. Sutrisna. 2013. “Moral Philosophy in Serat Centhini: Its Contribution for Character Education in Indonesia”. Asian Journal of Social Scienses & Humanities. Volome 2, Nomor 4. November 2013.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-01

How to Cite

Pardi, P., Indianto S, D., Nugroho, Y. E., Zaman, S., & Susilastri, D. (2023). Comparison Between Sheikh Amongraga’s and Tambangraras’ Actions in Serat Centhini and The Novel of Centhini: Kekasih Yang Tersembunyi. Proceeding of Saizu International Conference on Transdisciplinary Religious Studies, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.24090/icontrees.2023.695