The Efficiency of Extensive Reading Using Reading A-Z On Vocabulary Enrichment
Keywords:
extensive reading, vocabulary, enrichment, Reading A-ZAbstract
Gadgets can either distract or facilitate students' learning activities in this digital age. As for positive impact, gadgets are effective tools to intrigue students' perceptions and behaviors in reading. Reading A-Z, one of the digital literacy platforms with more than 2000 fiction and nonfiction books at various levels, has been encouraging its users worldwide to read extensively – including some schools in Indonesia. A small-scale quantitative study was carried out in second grade at one private primary school in Bandung to discover the efficacy of Reading A-Z in cultivating students' vocabulary development. Ten students with low reading performance are chosen and distributed into two groups: control & experimental. The first group is not exposed to extensive reading activities, while the latter has a 2-week reading session with various themed books from Reading A-Z. Questionnaires and Vocabulary Levels Test (VLT) by Nation & Schmitt are arranged before and after. The findings show that there is a significant improvement on the students’ vocabulary mean score of the experimental group from 49,6 to 55 while there is not any improvement shown by the control group. It is suggested that using digital literacy platform such as Reading A-Z for extensive reading program can potentially increase student’s vocabulary development.
References
Alfaki, I. M. 2014. A Contrastive Study in Sentence Construction between English and Nubian Language. American International Journal of Contemporary Research.
Bamford, J. and R. R. Day, eds. 2004. Extensive reading activities for teaching language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coady, J., & Huckin, T. 1997. Second language vocabulary acquisition: A rationale for pedagogy. Cambridge University Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1990. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience." Journal of Leisure Research, 24(1), pp. 93–94
Ernawati, A. B. (2019). The Application of Let's Read! in Extensive Reading Class: Integrating MALL and Task-based Learning. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, Vol. 6(3), 317-329. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17509/mimbar-sd.v6i3.20870
Krashen, S. 2003. Explorations in Language Acquisition and Use. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Mason, B., & Krashen, S. 1997. Extensive Reading in English as a Foreign Language. System, 25, 91-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(96)00063-2
Milton, J. & Daller, JT. 2013. Vocabulary size revisited: The link between vocabulary size and academic achievement. Applied Linguistics Review 4(1) DOI:10.1515/applirev-2013-0007
Renandya, W. A., & Jacobs, G.M. (Eds.). (2016). Extensive reading and listening in the L2. English Language Teaching Today: Linking Theory and Practice. Switzerland: Springer
Renandya, W. A., Hamied, F. A., & Nurkamto, J. (2018). English Language Proficiency in Indonesia: Issues and Prospects. The Journal of Asia Tefl, 15(3), 618–629. http://dx.doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2018.15.3.4.618
Scarborough, H. S. 2001. Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. In S. Neuman & D. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook for research in early literacy. New York: Guilford Press.
Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D., & Clapham, C. 2001. Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test. Language testing, 18(1), 55-88.
Suwartono, T. & Aniuranti, A. 2018. Digital Teaching Tools in 21st Century EFL Classroom: Are Our Teachers Ready?. ELLITE: Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching
T. Wero., Machmud, K. & Husain, N. 2021. The Study on Students’ Vocabulary Size. Jambura Journal of English Teaching and Literature – Vol 2(1), April 2021: 22 – 34
Tiryaki, Z. M., & Tütüniş, B. 2012. The role of extensive reading on vocabulary. ELT Research Journal, 1(4), 209-21.
