Teachers' Perspectives on ChatGPT as A Language Teaching Resource: Benefits, Challenges, and Pedagogical Considerations

Authors

  • Maria Vineki Riyadini Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia
  • Anita Triastuti Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia

Keywords:

ChatGPT, instructional practices, language teaching resources, teachers’ perspectives

Abstract

ChatGPT is frequently prescribed as a valuable tool for language teaching with its ability to generate human-like responses and engage in interactive conversations. This research study explores language teachers' perspectives on ChatGPT as a resource for language teaching. The study investigates the perceived benefits, challenges, pedagogical considerations, and specific ways language teachers utilize ChatGPT in their instructional practices. To address these questions, a mixed-methods research design was employed. Language teachers from diverse educational settings participated in a survey. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the qualitative data, while descriptive statistics were applied to analyze the quantitative data. The findings of this study shed light on the perceived benefits of ChatGPT, such as increased efficiency in lesson planning and additional language input for learners. On the other hand, teachers faced concerns about accuracy, reliability, and potential overreliance on technology. Moreover, the study explores how language teachers evaluate the pedagogical effectiveness of ChatGPT, considering factors such as learner engagement, language proficiency, and the alignment of ChatGPT-generated content with learning objectives. Overall, this study's results enhance understanding of the language teachers' perspectives regarding ChatGPT, facilitating informed discussions and further exploring its potential role and impact in language teaching contexts.

References

Abdelghani, Rania, Yen-Hsiang Wang, Xingdi Yuan, Tong Wang, Hélène Sauzéon, and Pierre-Yves Oudeyer. 2022. “GPT-3-Driven Pedagogical Agents for Training Children’s Curious Question-Asking Skills,” 1–38. http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.14228.

Adiguzel, Tufan, Mehmet Haldun Kaya, and Fatih Kürşat Cansu. 2023. “Revolutionizing Education with AI: Exploring the Transformative Potential of ChatGPT.” Contemporary Educational Technology 15 (3): 429.

Baskara, F X Risang, and F X Mukarto. 2023. “Exploring the Implications of ChatGPT for Language Learning in Higher Education.” Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics 7 (2): 343–58. https://doi.org/10.210 93/ijeltal.v7i2.1387.

Bellegarda, Jerome R. 2004. “Statistical Language Model Adaptation: Review and Perspectives.” Speech Communication 42 (1): 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2003.08.002.

Bengio, Yoshua, Réjean Ducharme, and Pascal Vincent. 2001. “A Neural Probabilistic Language Model (Short Version).” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2000/file/728f206c2a01bf572b5940d7d9a8fa4c-Paper.pdf.

Cheong, Wilson, and Hin Hong. 2023. “The Impact of ChatGPT on Foreign Language Teaching and Learning : Opportunities in Education and Research,” 37–45.

Chinonso, Opara Emmanuel, Adalikwu Mfon-Ette Theresa, and Tolorunleke Caroline Aduke. 2023. “ChatGPT for Teaching, Learning and Research: Prospects and Challenges.” Global Academic Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 5 (02): 33–40. https://doi.org/10.36348/gajhss.2023.v05i02.001.

Cotton, Debby R. E., Peter A. Cotton, and J. Reuben Shipway. 2023. “Chatting and Cheating: Ensuring Academic Integrity in the Era of ChatGPT.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 00 (00): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148.

Cropley, A. J. 2001. Creativity in Education and Learning: A Guide for Teachers and Educators. London: Kogan Page Ltd.

Devlin, Jacob, Ming Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2019. “BERT: Pre-Training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding.” NAACL HLT 2019 - 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies - Proceedings of the Conference 1 (Mlm): 4171–86.

Dijkstra, Ramon, Zülküf Genç, Subhradeep Kayal, and Jaap Kamps. 2022. “Reading Comprehension Quiz Generation Using Generative Pre-Trained Transformers.” CEUR Workshop Proceedings 3192.

Dwivedi, Yogesh K., Nir Kshetri, Laurie Hughes, Emma Louise Slade, Anand Jeyaraj, Arpan Kumar Kar, Abdullah M. Baabdullah, et al. 2023. “‘So What If ChatGPT Wrote It?’ Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Opportunities, Challenges and Implications of Generative Conversational AI for Research, Practice and Policy.” International Journal of Information Management 71 (March). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642.

Eke, Damian Okaibedi. 2023. “ChatGPT and the Rise of Generative AI: Threat to Academic Integrity?” Journal of Responsible Technology 13 (February): 100060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2023.100060.

Elkins, Katherine, and Jon Chun. 2020. “Can GPT-3 Pass a Writer’s Turing Test?” Journal of Cultural Analytics 5 (2). https://doi.org/10.22148/001C.17212.

Eysenbach, Gunther. 2023. “The Role of ChatGPT, Generative Language Models, and Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: A Conversation with ChatGPT and a Call for Papers.” JMIR Medical Education 9 (1).

Farrokhnia, Mohammadreza, Seyyed Kazem Banihashem, Omid Noroozi, and Arjen Wals. 2023. “A SWOT Analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for Educational Practice and Research.” Innovations in Education and Teaching International 00 (00): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846.

Fitria, Tira Nur. 2023. “Artificial Intelligence (AI) Technology in OpenAI ChatGPT Application : A Review of ChatGPT in Writing English Essay.” Journal of English Language Teaching 6 (361): 44–58. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/elt%0AArtificial.

Floridi, Luciano, and Massimo Chiriatti. 2020. “GPT-3: Its Nature, Scope, Limits, and Consequences.” Minds and Machines 30 (4): 681–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09548-1.

Gabajiwala, E., P. Mehta, R. Singh, and R. Koshy. 2022. “Quiz Maker: Automatic Quiz Generation from Text Using NLP.” In Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 523–33. Singapore: Springer.

Kasneci, Enkelejda, Kathrin Sessler, Stefan Küchemann, Maria Bannert, Daryna Dementieva, Frank Fischer, Urs Gasser, et al. 2023. “ChatGPT for Good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Education.” Learning and Individual Differences 103 (February): 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274.

Kohnke, Lucas, Benjamin Luke Moorhouse, and Di Zou. 2023. “ChatGPT for Language Teaching and Learning.” RELC Journal, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868.

Lai, Viet Dac, Nghia Trung Ngo, Amir Pouran Ben Veyseh, Hieu Man, Franck Dernoncourt, Trung Bui, and Thien Huu Nguyen. 2023. “ChatGPT Beyond English: Towards a Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models in Multilingual Learning.” http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.05613.

LeCun,Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. 2015. “Deep Learning.” Nature 521 (7553): 436–44.

Perkins, Mike. 2023. “Academic Integrity Considerations of AI Large Language Models in the Post-Pandemic Era: ChatGPT and Beyond.” Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice 20 (2): 7.

Qadir, Junaid. 2023. “Engineering Education in the Era of ChatGPT: Promise and Pitfalls of Generative AI for Education.” In In 2023 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 1–9.

Rahman, Md Mostafizer, and Yutaka Watanobe. 2023. “ChatGPT for Education and Research: Opportunities, Threats, and Strategies.” Applied Sciences 13 (9): 5783.

Shazly, Reham El. 2021. “Effects of Artificial Intelligence on English Speaking Anxiety and Speaking Performance: A Case Study.” Expert Systems 38 (3): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.12667.

Sok, Sarin, and Kimkong Heng. 2023. “ChatGPT for Education and Research: A Review of Benefits and Risks.” SSRN Electronic Journal 4378735.

TiLund, No, Brady D, Ting Wang, Nishith Reddy Mannuru, Bing Nie, Somipam Shimray, and Ziang Wang. 2023. “ChatGPT and a New Academic Reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written Research Papers and the Ethics of the Large Language Models in Scholarly Publishing.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 74 (5): 570–81.

Vaswani, A., N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, and I. Polosukhin. 2017. “Attention Is All You Need.” In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30. CA USA: Long Beach: 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems.

Zhai, Xiaoming. 2023. “ChatGPT User Experience: Implications for Education.” SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4312418.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-19

How to Cite

Vineki Riyadini, M., & Triastuti , A. (2023). Teachers’ Perspectives on ChatGPT as A Language Teaching Resource: Benefits, Challenges, and Pedagogical Considerations. Conference on English Language Teaching, 1105–1115. Retrieved from https://proceedings.uinsaizu.ac.id/index.php/celti/article/view/614